Land
Retain source identifiers, extraction time and business time in a restricted raw layer.
- Receives
- CRM, channel and product extracts
- Produces
- Source aligned datasets
Build measurement foundations that connect campaign activity, customer behavior and revenue with definitions everyone can inspect.
Let’s connect
A reporting architecture needs a defined grain at every layer. Event, opportunity and account data should be combined through deliberate relationships.
Retain source identifiers, extraction time and business time in a restricted raw layer.
Normalize campaign keys, account identity, currency and dates while preserving the original values for investigation.
Implement a metric contract covering grain, filters, date role and refresh rules in the shared reporting layer.
Present results with freshness, exclusions and source references so users can assess what the measure supports.
Select a field to examine its owner, permitted changes and conflict handling. Clear ownership keeps updates consistent across systems.
| Field or object | Accountable owner | Mapping and control |
|---|---|---|
| CRM | One opportunity may have many stage events and campaign touches. | |
| Source system | Keep separate from warehouse ingestion time. | |
| Analytics owner | Tracks changes to eligibility, filters and calculation. |
Current pipeline and pipeline movement answer different questions. Preserve snapshots or transitions when historical state matters.
Credit assigned by an attribution model is not evidence of incremental effect. State the available touchpoints and model limits.
Select the scenarios to discuss with your implementation team.
A dashboard is only as useful as the definitions and data behind it. UniLink helps teams establish what to measure, where each measure comes from and how it should inform a decision. We connect marketing and CRM data with the context needed to interpret it responsibly.
The scope can include tracking plans, campaign taxonomy, warehouse models, attribution frameworks and executive reporting. We distinguish operational measures from analytical estimates and make data freshness, coverage and limitations visible. A report should help a team ask better questions as well as answer familiar ones.
Translate business questions into defined metrics, dimensions, data sources and review responsibilities.
Specify event names, parameters, identity rules and consent requirements before implementing collection.
Relate campaigns, contacts, accounts and opportunities while preserving the grain of each dataset.
Compare suitable attribution approaches and document missing touchpoints, identity limitations and interpretation boundaries.
Design reporting views for operational teams and leadership, with clear definitions and source references.
Introduce checks for completeness, duplication, validity and freshness, with ownership for investigating failures.
Identify the questions your teams need to answer and the actions each answer could change.
Agree a metric dictionary, inspect source data and assess whether the required evidence exists.
Build transformations and reports, reconcile totals and review edge cases such as reopened opportunities or deleted records.
Document refresh expectations, quality checks and the process for changing a definition or adding a source.
Read the contracts, controls and failure behavior behind a maintainable implementation.
Attribution reports distribute credit using a chosen model. They do not by themselves establish causality. Where a causal question matters, an appropriate experiment or additional measurement method may be needed.
Yes. We work from your reporting needs and current stack, including platforms such as Power BI, Looker Studio and Tableau.
We identify gaps, assess their impact and separate usable measures from estimates. Collection and governance improvements can then be prioritized alongside the reporting work.
Tell us where your operations are today. We’ll help you see what comes next.